Upon the completion of the flagging process – the following
day – the epicenter of the site revealed itself to be the most level ground on
very east of the field, nearest to the Nolichucky River – a common location as discovered
through previous field projects in the region – while smaller scatters of artifacts
were found outside this main concentration.
Once the flagging process was completed we began to collect
the artifacts by way of dog leashes. This method is executed by placing one’s
self in a group of flags and collecting everything within a five meter radius
of their center – we began at the south western tip working our way across the
field, avoiding isolated finds as often as possible. The center of each dog
leash circle was given a designated number, flagged, and plotted on a map
sketch of the area in order to keep the integrity of the town’s organization.
The vast area along with the large amount of findings prohibit a swift
completion of the gathering of all artifacts. Scenarios such as these are often
conducive to looters, however, our daily presence at the site along with the benefit
of its location on private property has allowed us to avoid becoming another
chapter in the long book of looted archaeological sites.
Prior to the onset of the Iraq war in 2003 archeologists in
the area and throughout the Middle East were brought home without the ability
to clean up or finish that season’s work. Martin Gottlieb’s article in the New York Times on June 12, 2003 quoted
the University of Chicago Dr. Gibson as he described the aftermath of the
looting of several active archaeological sites as a “devastated landscape” which
resembled “Swiss cheese” due to the deep holes dug by looters. This example is
just one of the many challenges that archaeologists face during a successful
and prolonged dig. [1]
Figure 1.
Aerial view of the devastated site of Umma, southern Iraq, in September 2003.
Looter pits eclipse scientifically excavated areas identifiable by walls and
mounds of spoil in their immediate proximity. Courtesy of Comando Carabinieri
Tutela Patrimonio Culturale.[2]
[1]
Martin Gottlieb, Looters Swarm Over Remote Sites, Study Finds, New York Times, June 12, 2003: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/12/world/after-the-war-antiquities-looters-swarm-over-remote-sites-study-finds.html
[2]
Kathryn Tubb, Irreconcilable Differences? Problems with Unprovenanced Antiquities,
Papers from the Institute of Archaeology,
Vol. 18 (2007): http://pia-journal.co.uk/rt/printerFriendly/pia.294/390